iPod Nano Prototype With Camera is Real But Has Problems

POST

MAIL

Posted February 1, 2012 at 8:08pm by iClarified

The iPad Nano prototype leaked earlier today has been declared real; however, there are problems with its camera, according to M.I.C. Gadget.

According to our factory sources, Apple have problems with the lens aperture for the next-gen iPod nano, the iris is not functioning correctly to allow the advantages of the low aperture to be utilized. Every shot was overexposed. Apple intends to correct its mistake, but the problem still exists in this prototype that is manufactured two months ago. What's more, a 2-megapixel camera was tested, but it was unsatisfactory - the photos look washed-out and flat. The good news is… this 2-month-old prototype is close to final product, the UI is done.

Its thought that the new iPod Nano will be released with camera in the first or second quarter of 2012.

Read More [via Darryl]

iPod Nano Prototype With Camera is Real But Has Problems

Follow iClarified

murslin - February 3, 2012 at 1:37pm

it is only body of ipod nano with camera design . it is not complete. now it is a design only ........

Reply · Like

Marco - February 2, 2012 at 7:24am

Ha it says iPad fail!

Steve Jubs the Messiah - February 2, 2012 at 2:18pm

Proper fail! Or maybe they're privy to info we aren't

AnCedano - February 2, 2012 at 4:05am

Only 2mpx mmm they can do something better!

JOJO - February 2, 2012 at 12:54am

I have a perfect design which can stop the conflict of the colliding with the camera but apple wouldent listen anyhow 2mp? apple seriously i can get an old 2002 nokia with 3 mp better than this!

Sweet Potatoe - February 1, 2012 at 10:48pm

Put a bluetooth instead, that could pair with an iphone and bluetooth headset so that it can notify you with calls or text and even answer calls without bringing out your iphone.. I think thats much better dont you think

Mustang - February 1, 2012 at 9:28pm

No it's not. If you are using it as iWatch you have very nice futuristic "facetime".

Amriibacchus - February 1, 2012 at 10:06pm

No FaceTime cause would need wifi and not as watch cause camera is on back... Would be looking at wrist

Stefan - February 1, 2012 at 8:18pm

The camera is useless.