Teardown and X-Ray Image of Apple Lightning to 3.5mm Audio Adapter Reveals Mystery Chip
LIKE
TWEET
SHARE
PIN
SHARE
POST
MAIL
MORE
Posted October 6, 2016 at 4:07pm by iClarified
iFixit has posted a teardown of the new Apple Lightning to 3.5mm headphone adapter. Creative Electron provided the site with X-ray images of the audio adapter which reveal a mystery chip, likely a DAC.
As expected, one end is a simple female 3.5 mm headphone jack, and the other end is a male Lightning connector. But what’s all that silicon around the Lightning connector end? Most of the retail space near the connector is taken up by a single mystery IC.
User oldturkey03 managed to slice his adapter open and reveal the markings on the chip. Unfortunately, they only tell us the chip is from Apple.
He uncovered that mystery IC by the Lightning connector, marked 338S00140 A0SM1624 TW—which doesn’t tell us much, other than it’s an Apple part number.
The chip is believed to contain a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) and amplifier, as well as, an analog-to-digital-converter (ADC).
So how well does the converter perform? German computer tech magazine c’t ran a bunch of tests on the adapter. Compared to the headphone jacks on the iPhone 6s and iPad Air, sound quality did drop ever so slightly. For example, playing an uncompressed 16-bit audio file saw the dynamic range drop from 99.1 dB at the headphone jack on the iPhone 6s to 97.3 dB at the adapter. However, the wouldn't be noticed by most listeners.
Of course it's a DAC. Apple said themselves that the lightening port output is a 100% digital signal. EarPods, speakers, headphones and anything else that vibrates and produces sound is by nature analog. Therefore, it is not possible that the EarPods and the adapter do not have an imbedded DAC. Also, since even the worst USB DAC's are gigantic compared to that lightening to headphone jack adapter, there is no way on earth that Apple did not make substantial compromises to sound quality to not include a headphone jack. The concept is (imo) stupid!
And people assumed the EarPods were the same. Jokes on them! @curtix I found it necessary not to have the jack, but overall I find the concept not as stupid.