Judge Dismisses Apple Employee Lawsuit Over Wages Lost Due to Bag Searches
LIKE
TWEET
SHARE
PIN
SHARE
POST
MAIL
MORE
Posted December 31, 2014 at 1:14am by iClarified
A U.S. District Court Judge William Alsop has dismissed the class action lawsuit filed against Apple over wages lost due to bag searches at retail stores.
The original suit claimed that Apple's anti-theft policy and bag search policies at retail stores can cause employees to wait 15 minutes every time they clock out to leave for a lunch break or at the end of a shift -- resulting in over $1,500 of unpaid wages each year per employee.
A similar case involving Amazon hit the Supreme Court earlier this year and the court sided with Amazon, claiming that bag searches were not "integral and indispensable" to their jobs; therefore, Amazon was not responsible for paying employees for time spent standing in security lines.
Judge William Alsop based his ruling on the Supreme court case and ultimately dismissed two class action lawsuits facing Apple.
Do you think employees should be paid for waiting in line as they are screened for stolen merchandise?
Arron is right at the end of the day if you don't like it leave.. If you are the type of person to complain about the a 10-15 mins security search (which lets be honest that time is massively overhyped) then you should bother getting up in tr morning...
At my job if they want you to stay for any reason for longer than 5 mind we get paid. If they need you for anything after your shift ends it's not unreasonable to expect to be paid for your time.
They should be paid because it is part of their job. This thing is for corporate benefit not employees so if they(corporate) save money by checking employees then they should have no problem by paying them.
You have a designated 30 minute break. Your break is from 1230 till 1 o'clock. Are you back at your post at 1 o'clock, or is that the time you begin walking the five minutes it takes to get from the cafeteria?
If you don't like the job, don't accept it.
It's not like they found this out the first day on the job.
And also for the time spent getting ready for work before you enter your vehicle. And...let's see...oh oh, i know. For having to get rested before all that. And, well you see where this is going.
I actually get compensated/Paid when I drive for work. Policies are created for individual companies and if you don't like it, don't take the job. Corporate pays employees by miles they have to use their vehicles to get meet with prospect and customers. It's wear and tear compensations. Walking or security requirements is not one of them. Working in the same place on a daily basis does not require companies to pay compensation.
I never went through security checks, those happen at the retail stores like the article described. In addition, you can always choose whether you want to work at a job with security checks or not. Simply don't take the job.